I don't see any problems with owning children's rainwear, because the attraction is solely in the look and feel of the shiny and smooth material.
It is totally different to ped*philia, which is defined as a sexual attraction to actual children.
Therefore, you've really got nothing to worry about. It was a good question to ask though.
N.B: I've amended shinypvcaddict's post very slightly by way of inserting asteriskes into that ped* word so they cannot be found on search engines
Children's rainwear - a debate.
-
- Posts: 847
- Joined: June 22nd, 2013, 9:14 pm
- Location: Austin, TX.
Re: Children's rainwear - a debate.
Not me. I don't own any children's rainwear because it would make me feel weird. And besides they probably wouldn't fit anyway. I'll stick to women's raincoats. A much bigger turnon.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: May 6th, 2014, 9:34 pm
Re: Children's rainwear - a debate.
I have many items of the equipment under discussion because I have several of the 3' Barbies, who will be extras when I
finally make (soon, I hope) the Dark Fantasy Home Movie. This has nothing to do with actual children; rather the image is of
adults. The movie will be a combination Monster/Disaster theme--something like "Behemoth Beast Eats Barbie." Check out
the 1942 Superman cartoon where the sort-of T Rex capsises the fire boat.
finally make (soon, I hope) the Dark Fantasy Home Movie. This has nothing to do with actual children; rather the image is of
adults. The movie will be a combination Monster/Disaster theme--something like "Behemoth Beast Eats Barbie." Check out
the 1942 Superman cartoon where the sort-of T Rex capsises the fire boat.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: May 6th, 2014, 9:34 pm
Re: Children's rainwear - a debate.
That's what I do.