Children's rainwear - a debate.

All rainwear discussions in general or that do not fit into other categories.
Post Reply
mason
Posts: 1024
Joined: February 2nd, 2010, 3:34 am

Re: Children's rainwear - a debate.

Post by mason »

I don't see any problems with owning children's rainwear, because the attraction is solely in the look and feel of the shiny and smooth material.

It is totally different to ped*philia, which is defined as a sexual attraction to actual children.

Therefore, you've really got nothing to worry about. It was a good question to ask though.

N.B: I've amended shinypvcaddict's post very slightly by way of inserting asteriskes into that ped* word so they cannot be found on search engines
raincoatboy
Posts: 847
Joined: June 22nd, 2013, 9:14 pm
Location: Austin, TX.

Re: Children's rainwear - a debate.

Post by raincoatboy »

Not me. I don't own any children's rainwear because it would make me feel weird. And besides they probably wouldn't fit anyway. I'll stick to women's raincoats. A much bigger turnon.
Oilskin_Lover
Posts: 31
Joined: May 6th, 2014, 9:34 pm

Re: Children's rainwear - a debate.

Post by Oilskin_Lover »

I have many items of the equipment under discussion because I have several of the 3' Barbies, who will be extras when I
finally make (soon, I hope) the Dark Fantasy Home Movie. This has nothing to do with actual children; rather the image is of
adults. The movie will be a combination Monster/Disaster theme--something like "Behemoth Beast Eats Barbie." Check out
the 1942 Superman cartoon where the sort-of T Rex capsises the fire boat.
Oilskin_Lover
Posts: 31
Joined: May 6th, 2014, 9:34 pm

Re: Children's rainwear - a debate.

Post by Oilskin_Lover »

That's what I do.
Post Reply